Outdoor Sports Shoes -- Montrail And VASQUE&Nbsp

1. waterproof and breathable

　 Montrail Fusion all-around shoes

Waterproof and breathable with GORE-TEX XCR Material Science .

　　 VASQUE Seven thousand two hundred and nineteen

Use GORE-TEX waterproof breathable material.

Montrail Fusion all-purpose shoes are better than waterproof and breathable.

2. anti-collision and abrasion resistance

Montrail Fusion all-around shoes

Linen cloth is used for face cloth, and thermoplastic for toe protection. Plastic The heel is protected by casting mould plastic, and the bottom is FasTrax carbonized rubber.

VASQUE 7219

Face cloth is made of 2mm suede cowhide + nylon upper, and the toe part is reinforced with rubber protective sheet, patent STEALTH high friction rubber outsole.

Because of the use of reinforced rubber protector in the toe part of V, it is indeed guaranteed from the actual situation than that of M.

And the wear resistance of both sides should be quite equal. And the aspect of cloth is obviously that the strength of V is higher, and it can be worn out by others.

3. Comfort sticker

Montrail Fusion all-around shoes

Just wearing it can be said to have used the power of "two tigers" to put their feet in. (my feet are compared with Chinese feet, and the width of my feet is high). When my feet go in, I feel a little squeezing on both sides.

VASQUE 7219

After loosening the shoelace slightly, the foot can be slipped easily into it, and it is felt that there is no need for the foot fit cycle. It seems that it can start soon.

But when you use it, you will find that M is not very obvious. It is found that M is very close to the feet. It seems to wrap tightly on every inch of the skin of the foot, and V obviously feels the internal friction is obvious after use.

4. Arch support

This part may not be noticed by many friends, but for me, it will be very obvious because when wearing some shoes with poor support, walking for a longer time will show that the muscles on the bottom of the feet will gradually feel the pain, and the pain of not going to walk.

But M's shoes feel excellent because of the use of three layers of density EVA midsole and EVA insole. The support of the arch is very good, and the inner cushion tightly covers the arch of the foot, which makes it very easy to walk.

V shoes also have good performance, but the support of M is slightly soft.

5. Gripping

In the city's hard skating environment, if the shoes of M are wet, the level of grip on the slippery ground is obviously insufficient, while the shoes of V feel very little.

In the outdoors rough and non wet slippery flat hard ground, the M shoes grasping the ground performance is exceptionally outstanding, but V still maintains the good grip.

In this sense, M feels that the rubber dampness of the carbonized rubber on the bottom of the M is not as good as the STEALTH high friction rubber sole at the bottom of the V. However, under the condition of no wet water or non smooth ground, the ground holding of the M is better than the sole of the V shoe.

6. Up the hill and downhill

When V shoes go up the mountain, they feel better than the M shoes, especially the difference between the foot arch support. They feel that M shoes are more relaxed when they go up the mountain.

When downhill, V shoes feel that the internal friction of the shoes is sliding obviously, and even appear obvious not to follow the situation, it is still difficult to avoid sliding in the heel shoes. M shoes may be due to their special heel design. The downhill process is completely different from that of V shoes. As shown above, the heel design of M shoes fascinates me (my heel is more prominent, and the middle height shoes are very easy to grind and tear my feet) it may be one of the most satisfactory heel designs that I feel most satisfied with.

Conclusion:

It is obvious that V's shoes are stronger than the M's all-purpose shoes due to the enhanced rubber and anti fur resistance. But it is very likely that the moisture permeability of V shoes is obviously inferior to that of M shoes, especially the front sole.

In addition, the slippery effect of the slippery road in the city is that the V shoes should win slightly; while on the other road surface and up and down the mountain, the performance of the M shoes should be more prominent, and the comfort and safety are better than the V shoes.

Generally speaking, I prefer the shoes of M, whether in the process of going to work or in the outdoors, although the city's antiskid effect is not as good as that of V shoes, it is still better than most VB rubber outsole shoes, and there will be no slippage.